If you are looking for the comparison between Zignature vs Taste Of The Wild, you have come to the right place. In this article, we will discuss the comparisons between these two dog food brands on several aspects. So, continue reading below to find out which one that is the best dog food!
What we will discuss below include:
– The comparison of the ingredients used by the dog foods
– The nutritional values of Zignature vs Taste Of The Wild
– The available recipes on Zignature and Taste Of The Wild
– The reported issues and recalls that happened on each brand
– Which dog food that is generally more recommended
Let’s start by comparing the ingredients of Zignature and Taste Of The Wild. It is important to check the ingredients that they use because some products are nothing but fillers without nutritional benefits, and some ingredients are just dangerous. See also: Whole Earth Farms vs Merrick.
Zignature does use good quality ingredients. For example, the Trout and Salmon Meal Formula contains trout, salmon meal, chickpeas, peas, salmon oil, and natural flavors. Trout, a freshwater species, is rich in omega-3 fatty acids. Salmon meal is classified as a meat concentrate, and it has 300% more protein per mass than fresh fish. Chickpeas and peas are sources of carbohydrates and are rich of fiber.
However, Zignature also uses some ingredients that aren’t very good. There is pea flour, which increases the total protein content of the product but it is a plant-based ingredient. There is also dried alfalfa meal, which is high in plant protein and more commonly used for horse feeds. And there is beet pulp, which is mostly considered as a high-fiber filler.
Taste Of The Wild uses good quality ingredients, too. The first ingredients are real meats. So, it is serious in its effort to provide the best quality nutrition for your dog. The Southwest Canyon formula contains beef, peas and garbanzo peas, lamb meal, wild board, ocean fish meal, and egg product. The mentioned meats provide great protein.
But there are some ingredients in Taste Of The Wild that are a bit controversial. For example, there is canola oil. Although canola oil contains omega-3 fatty acids, plant-based oils are not completely absorbed by dogs. Also, canola oil may be acquired from a genetically modified organism. Taste Of The Wild contains pea flour and tomato pomace, too. Tomato pomace is an inexpensive filler. There is brewers yeast, which is actually nutritious but may cause allergy reactions on some dogs.
Now, let’s compare the nutritional values of Zignature vs Taste Of The Wild. The first factor to compare is protein. For dogs, protein is very important because, of the twenty-two essential amino acids that are required for normal bodily functions, ten of them can only be acquired from proteins from foods. So, you need to make sure that your dog gets the necessary proteins.
The protein levels of Zignature and Taste Of The Wild are more-or-less similar. The differences are very marginal and won’t cause significant effects. Both products provide good protein amounts.
The dry dog food of Zignature contains 32.5% crude protein, whereas the dry dog food of Taste Of The Wild contains 31.9% crude protein. The difference is only about 0.6%. Meanwhile, the wet dog food of Zignature contains 44.2% crude protein, while the wet dog food of Taste Of The Wild contains about 45.6%, so the difference is about 1.4%.
The second nutritional factor to compare is fat. Fat is also important for dogs because it is one of the primary source of energy and it is needed for certain bodily functions in a dog’s body.
Again, the differences are rather marginal here. Both Zignature and Taste Of The Wild provide good amounts of fat. Actually, the wet dog food of Zignature typically has more fat than the wet dog food of Taste Of The Wild, but it won’t cause a significant difference.
The dry dog food of Zignature contains 17.2% crude fat. The dry dog food of Taste Of The Wild contains 18.0% crude fat. The difference is only 0.8% that goes to Taste Of The Wild’s favor.
The wet dog doof of Zignature contains 24.2% crude fat. The wet dog food of Taste Of The Wild contains 21.7% crude fat. The difference is about 2.5%, and it goes to Zignature’s favor.
Finally, let’s compare the fiber content of Zignature vs Taste Of The Wild. Fiber is essential for your dog’s digestive health. Fiber is acquired from plant-based ingredients. So, it is wrong to say that dogs don’t need plant-based ingredients. In fact, most modern dogs nowadays need plant-based ingredients to thrive. Meats and plants, when combined, can provide complete nutrition for your dog.
The dry dog food of Zignature contains about 5.6% crude fiber, while the dry dog food of Taste Of The Wild contains about 5.0% crude fiber. The wet dog food of Zignature contains about 6.0% crude fiber, while the wet dog food of Taste Of The Wild contains about 5.6% crude fiber. The differences are very marginal.
Zignature is available in various recipes suitable for all life stages. Some examples include:
– Zignature Trout and Salmon Meal Formula
– ZignatureZssential Formula
– Zignature Kangaroo Formula
– Zignature Venison Formula
– Zignature Catfish Formula
– Zignature Lamb Formula
– Zignature Duck Formula
– Zignature Turkey Formula
– Zignature Pork Formula
Taste Of The Wild provides several different recipes for all life stages. Some recipes are for specific breeds or purposes. Some examples are:
– Taste Of The Wild Southwest Canyon
– Taste Of The Wild High Prairie Formula
– Taste Of The Wild Wetlands Formula
– Taste Of The Wild Sierra Mountain
– Taste Of The Wild Pine Forest
– Taste Of The Wild Pacific Stream Formula
– Taste Of The Wild Appalachian Valley Small Breed
– Taste Of The Wild High Prairie Puppy Formula
– Taste Of The Wild Pacific Stream Puppy Formula
Issues and Recalls
Zignature has never been recalled. Unfortunately, it has received some bad reviews. Some users say that Zignature made their dogs itchy or develop skin problems. This may be caused by allergy. So, make sure to check the ingredient list to see if there is any ingredient that may cause allergy on your dog.
Taste Of The Wild has ever been recalled once in the past, which is in May 2012 due to salmonella contamination. However, the company apparently has taken care of the problem properly. The user reviews of Taste Of The Wild are generally more positive. Most users are happy that Taste Of The Wild make their dogs fit and healthy. Still, you need to avoid this product if your dog is allergic to the brewers yeast ingredient.
Zignature vs Taste Of The Wild
|Zignature||Taste Of The Wild|
|- Good ingredients, but uses pea flour, dried alfalfa meal, beet pulp||- Good quality ingredients, but uses pea flour and tomato pomace|
|- Slightly higher protein and fat||- Slightly lower protein and fat|
|- Available in formulas for all life stages||- Has all life stage formulas and specific formulas|
|- May cause skin problems on some dogs||- Uses brewers yeast, which is not recommended for allergic dogs|
In general, Taste Of The Wild is more recommended because of the better ingredient quality. It also has better reviews from the users, as it usually doesn’t cause skin problems or allergy reactions. It provides good amounts of nutrition for your dog.